Two flowers that keep winning our easy-care rankings. Someone has to take the belt.
Shot to one scale: bloom beside bloom, from our own library.
The verdicts, line by line
Every line below is a field of the open table, not an opinion.
In the vase
Neither carries enough published cut-flower data for an honest vase verdict, so this duel is settled in the garden.
In the garden
On upkeep the table sides with catmint: rated low maintenance against medium.
The full card
A line is marked only where one flower clearly leads. Equal or too-close values are left plain.
| Field | Coreopsis | Catmint |
|---|---|---|
| Fragrance | not recorded | Highly aromatic foliage and flowers |
| Light | Full sun to part shade | Full sun to part shade |
| Water | Dry to medium; drought tolerant once established | Dry to medium |
| Hardiness zones | 3 to 9 | 3 to 9 |
| Bloom months | 6 months | 5 months |
| Deer (Rutgers) | Rarely damaged in C. verticillata (Rutgers A) to seldom damaged in C. lanceolata (Rutgers B) | Rarely damaged (Rutgers A) |
| Cats (ASPCA) | Listed non-toxic | Never evaluated |
We keep one table of 85 flowers, with 25 documented facts each, drawn from university and extension sources. Every ranking is a published formula worth 100 points; tap any score and it unfolds into the lines that made it. A flower that does not fit the question is not scored lower: it is excluded, and the reason is shown. When the table changes, every score and stamp updates itself. The full method ↗
Read the full profile
Everything the table holds on each of them, in plain prose.
Enjoying our flower guides? Add YourFlowersGuide as a preferred source on Google. It helps more readers find us.
Add to Preferred Sources